Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As far as Manamana goes, it likely is going to be incredibly meaningless as it has already been slated that the entire canal and its development will be reworked and probably resemble little of its original form, only enough to honor key proponents of it (SSI and Synturia - this was discussed among those in Aurelia and Mesothalassa). Beyond that, it certainly is open for discussion. Personally, I know we had plans to have sensibly and reworked NPCs on Aurelia and we could have one of them fulfill the role Asgeirra did - I will look more closely into his imprint so I can further post on my stance with them.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Oyus said:

As far as Manamana goes, it likely is going to be incredibly meaningless as it has already been slated that the entire canal and its development will be reworked and probably resemble little of its original form, only enough to honor key proponents of it (SSI and Synturia - this was discussed among those in Aurelia and Mesothalassa). Beyond that, it certainly is open for discussion. Personally, I know we had plans to have sensibly and reworked NPCs on Aurelia and we could have one of them fulfill the role Asgeirra did - I will look more closely into his imprint so I can further post on my stance with them.

Thanks Oyus. Alright. Let's disregard the Manamana point. Though the other instances and the main point still holds.

Good to hear that NPC ideas are abound. There isn't a whole lot that the NPC would need to fulfil in terms of criteria but all the same I look forward to seeing how Aurelia will develop these--hopefully resembling Asgeirria enough to be easily recognisable!

  • Like 3

ukO0mOV.png
FACTBOOK | NEWS | FOREIGN AFFAIRS | TWITTER | ARCHIVES |

FOUNDER AND MEMBER OF:

ATARA-TRADE | TRIDENT -DEFENCE WARD-AIR DEFENCE |

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Iverica said:

Good to hear that NPC ideas are abound. There isn't a whole lot that the NPC would need to fulfil in terms of criteria but all the same I look forward to seeing how Aurelia will develop these--hopefully resembling Asgeirria enough to be easily recognisable!

After having skim read a good bit of the threads, I think a wipe and NPC substitution would be ideal for sure. Total erasure certainly wouldn't be fitting, not without a substitute. An Aurelian NPC could probably be molded to something needed to take the role Asgeirria had in these posts without actually retaining the prime location or IP of Asgeirria. It would certainly allow Team Aurelia proceed as it would like to and give it something to do with its NPCs, something to add in. I know a couple I'd like to mold could potentially fit the bill, but a conversation only needed if none other believes there are better NPCs suited in Aurelia, or perhaps Alharu for that matter. It may be more sensible to be of Alharu or even Argis as opposed to Aurelia given that Asgeirria's desired power projection is realistic for a very limited amount of nations as it stands. A regional partner seems more sensible to me to fill the role left behind by Asgeirria.

Edited by Oyus
  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Anatea
      I hope this topic is in the right section .-.
      Aaaanyway, here i am again for asking to our beloved and powerful @Orioni if would be possible to add some cities to my nation on Eurth's map and, about the last update, add some NPC nations that i need for the lore of Anatea
      About the map for the city & the NPC nations here you go:

      If you need to read better the names of the cities here you go a detailed map of Anatea where you can read better the names in case of problems About the NPC nations here's the explanation for why they're here:
      Astarlia: this nation was part of Anatea in the Classical & Post-Classical Era, becoming indipendent after a civil war in 1014. From that year on the relations between the two nations were quite hostile, but after some time they began to become more friendly until they signed a defensive pact for themselves, helping each other in any possible way. The relation between them would be similiar to the one between UK and USA. Ex Ruthenian nations (New Ruthenia, Casma, Lybadev and Pyrr): once part of the Federal Republic of Ruthenia (really similiar to Yugoslavia), after the Dalstavian War they become indipendent, changing their type of government after years under a bloody dictatorship. They are an important part of Anatea's lore due to the fact that the ruthenian invasions in the Classical & Post-Classical Era conquered Ruthenia and the Dalstavia region (once part of Anatea in the same Age), also the Dalstavian War is an important part of the history of Anatea because it will begin the subplot of Anatea about who was really behind the entire conflict (hinted in "In the Shadow" chapter) and the beginning of Anatea being a not isolationist nation anymore. Azuria: once part of Anatea in the Classical & Post-Classical Era, it will become indipendent (WIP about why & when) and later on an hostile nation towards Anatea & Astarlia, triggering the defensive pact that the two nations have (WIP about why & when). Before the end of 2021, a war between Anatea & Astarlia VS Azuria will break out, resulting in the invasion of the nation and then in its splitting (showed in the map) and annexation (similiar to what happened to Germany after WW2). Illirea: even this nation was part of Anatea in the Classical & Post-Classical Era, but then it was conquered by Zastov in the 1600s. Later on will become indipendent by Zastov togheter with Yustov and it will be peacefully annexed by Anatea for protection with the upcoming tensions between Anatea and Zastov and for return to be one thing with Anatea. Zastov: a really important nation for the lore of Anatea. It's a far-right nation masked as a democracy. It will be involved in various part of Anatea's lore, beginning with a war in the 1600s which will take Illirea from Anatea, and then it will fight once again Anatea in the "Ruthenian War" in 1860 [Ruthenian War= Zastov, being landlocked, tried to attack and conquer Ruthenia (the weakest nation in the region) for have an outlet to the sea for commercial reasons, but a coalition composed by Anatea, Ruthenia, Astarlia and Erastia will prevent Zastov to reach the sea, protecting Ruthenia and winning the war (similiar to the Crimean War)]. In the modern age it will become a rival of Anatea after the fall of Azuria and there will be some tensions, just to create some interesting rps in the future. Erastia: a kingdom in the southern part of Aurelia. It will be involved in the "Ruthenian War" along with Anatea and will have some peaceful relations with Anatea. Yustov: once part of Zastov, it will become independent and then will be annexed peacefully by Anatea for protection against Zastov. Ostav: an island Union, it will become important in the modern age with the "Clear War" (1923-1925), the first war in which Anatea will use airplanes and will understand the importance of air superiority. This war is important because it's the first war in the South Aurelian region in which no civilians were harmed (because the conflict was fought primarily in the sea, and with the sole use of aircrafts and ships). Nostromm: Not important, just a name that would fit to the nation Taygene: important nation in the lore of Anatea because it had an alliance with it. It will be the main trigger for the "Clear War", without fighting in the war. The end!
      The blueish color on Anatea and in some nations is the maximum extension of Anatea in the future rps, just to warn how much i want to expand Anatea (i will post the expansion ideas in the future and after i contributed to the region of course) and which NPC nations will be involved (probably around 2025/2026 the expansion would be completed :O).
      Thank you for reading!
    • By Iverica
      Just putting this down here so it doesn't get lost on Discord. Basis: IP Audit Sheet
      On the next round of updates, I'd like to put forth a list of nations (appearing red on the sheet) to be removed from the map.
      Procedure  (See Amendment 3) was followed. Allowance time (more than necessary) was given for a response Floor was open for comments among the staff on what to do with the concerned nations. No objections were heard. From what I can see, there are no reasons to keep the following nations around:
      Lusotropia Stalgora Valacia Theodoria Aluxia Saale Pyemcgowan Pallamara Rihan Cavunia Sylvet Fjallshima Further more the following nations have been contacted and have been given more than enough time to respond. They differ because of amount of contributions/posts/relevance to some RP--therefore, I put their names forward for a reduction of their land area (to area around capital). Enough so that they do not take up too valuable a real estate.
      Beleareas Alenveil Asgeirria Limonaia Kaitaine Eurofuhrer Dniester Great Burlington Astriedan  
      If anyone has any objections at all and you have a concrete plan on what to do with them, last chance to speak. Otherwise please avoid speculating or spitballing! I think enough formality has been followed and time spent on this matter.
       
      Updated: Nation names that are not on the audit list were added here due to sustained inactivity and lack of response on regular channels.
    • By Lahui
      Hey all! After looking at the latest map of Europa (which is quite nice, btw), how are the remaining nations on the map being treated (countries without any active action)? My little ole island chain was pretty much left alone, but I do see that there are large swaths of countries still exist, albeit with their owners not having been on for a while (somewhat like the proverbial pot calling the kettle black, I suppose).
      Nonetheless, with the possible exception of a nation returning, would they be treated as NPC nations - no mod to their borders or political principals, or territorial integrity, or macro-gaming, but some peripheral interaction as necessary for RP purposes?
×
×
  • Create New...