Upper Strathyclyde Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 I am working on a concept of a Europa Union. the main goals, would be worked out here, and it would be structured so that each member of the region would feel encouraged to join it. --- Goals: Establishment of a General Direction for Europan Politics, and how best to deal with International Terror. Establishment of a Unified Peacekeeping force, under a Joint Command. Establishment of a Strengthened and Combined Economic Force. Establishment of a set of protocols to deal with Belligerent Nations. Establishment on regulations of Free Trade and Tariffs. Establishment of Worker, Civil, Human, religious and Minority Rights of all member nations. Again, there is alot to be worked out, however I see that we can do this, and if we do, it would add a whole new level inro the Role Play experience, making it not only more realistic, but also more fun. Hell, we can correct the fundemental flaws in the REAL E.U. Link to comment
Suverina Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 It sounds good but I think you'll have a hard time recruiting members. Link to comment
Tagmatium Rules Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 (edited) Personally, I don't see the point in it. We have three alliances, there is no need for a third. Four, including the ECA. The goals of this are good, but the more powerful nations don't like being told what to do by anyone but themselves, especially in all of the fields stated And, after all, one of the funnest sorts of RP is the war rp, so why stop this from happening? Edited April 16, 2006 by Tagmatium Rules (see edit history) Link to comment
Haken Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 We have three alliances, there is no need for a third. Four, including the ECA. *laughs at math skills of Taggie* So... something like a UN for the region? Link to comment
Upper Strathyclyde Posted April 16, 2006 Author Share Posted April 16, 2006 Exactly. Personally, I am still going to put forth effort into making it. I'll keep y'all updated. Link to comment
Ravenhelm Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 This would be interesting. It wouldn't have to be a selective alliance, but you could join it if you wanted to without being pressured for being in another alliance, maybe? Link to comment
Italgria Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 well you cant really be into two alliances Rav... i have my concerns about it. Because there are already like 3 alliances going around here. Link to comment
Ravenhelm Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 I understand that, but this could be different than an alliance, unless he meant it to be one. Link to comment
Haken Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Well he said it was like the UN and the UN combines allmost all nations, so friends and foe could be in it. If this is the case, however, there need to be a lot of members otherwise it will easily lose it's neutrality or it's power. Link to comment
Ravenhelm Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Yes, you are correct - it needs to include almost everyone if not everyone. Link to comment
Upper Strathyclyde Posted April 16, 2006 Author Share Posted April 16, 2006 Its not an Alliance guys. Its an Organisation to promote increased cooperation between nations, Friend or Foe alike. Link to comment
Orioni Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 I thought NS UN nations were already bound to the NS UN-resolutions. Geneva convention, ban landmines, etc. Link to comment
Suverina Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 We're not all members of UN. Link to comment
Tagmatium Rules Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 Soo... Why the push for a pan-Europan war and now a pan-Europan peace? Link to comment
Recommended Posts