Bhalman Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 I was talking with Aki eariler about this and I was wondering if this should happen. The reason I bring this up would bring FAN and Europa closer in terms of RP and so forth. As you are all not aware, their are 3 rail networks* at this time in FAN all vying for prime destinations and Europa looks like a promising area of locations. When I started this, I did it by selection, choosing nations that I would connect to but those were all proposed routes and now I ask you, the region of desire to speak your mind and voice on this matter. Please vote and post the reason for your vote. Thank You. I will respect whatever the outcome is. *The Three Networks are the following: CHTN (Caldari Highspeed Train Network) TRTS (Typophilean Razor Train System) TIWT (Trodonian Intercontintal Wraith Train) Link to comment
Akiiryu Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 I am againtst this. Cross regional rps are generally hard to manage. Moreover the tecn levels between our two regions are FAR too different. I accidently votes YES and NO (you can do it) Please delete one of the yes votes from the final count. Link to comment
Xheng Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 I like railroads, provided somehow they can cross oceans and I can tax them to death. Link to comment
Ide Jima Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 If we really want to RP between our regions we may as well do it by plane or by ship surely? Link to comment
Tagmatium Rules Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 Gah, I'm in two minds. I mean, we've had Q102/Europan RP cross-overs, with Nevareion Nova coming here and my involvement in his civil war, albeit on a small scale. This works as our techs are more-or-less the same, give or take the odd thing. The FAN is future-tech, so there is less of a cross-over possible, without skewing our tech-level off. Link to comment
Vanarambaion Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Definitely negatory, for reasons stated by others above. Link to comment
Bhalman Posted February 16, 2006 Author Share Posted February 16, 2006 Definitely negatory, for reasons stated by others above. I gave up on this a long time ago, so I pronouce this matter over unless someone else has something to add. Link to comment
Vanarambaion Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Hmmm, that's odd. That showed up as a new thread for me for some reason. Sorry about the gravedigging there. Link to comment
Orioni Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 It wasn't bumped, so I don't understand how you got to see this one as new. (Voted 'for'.) Link to comment
Vanarambaion Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Figured it out. When someone votes, it shows up as a new post, so someone else was grave-digging, not me. Link to comment
Recommended Posts