Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The other night we were chatting, abet briefly, about the concept of introducing a resource map in addition to the complement of other maps we already have in play. I took that conversation and went digging back into my archives of NS maps of the past that I've kept on hand should some use could come of them and I managed to recover a resource map the former RP'ing region of Caprica made years ago.

minerals2.png

It's simple, yet effective. They had made it as a complement to their topographic maps (which I also have on hand).

We do not need an overly complicated map, it just needs to be practical, ensures that resources are seeded in fair and reasonable manner, and gives enough flexibility within the respective resource categories to allow creativity. Like if you have 'ore' - you would have the ability to define it.

Thoughts?

  • Like 3
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.

I imagine it can add an extra dimension to the RPing.

One thing I've been struggling on is precisely what sort of industries and resources would be common in Tagmatium. I don't know enough to conclusively work this sort of thing out to my satisfaction myself. It might be big enough to have something of most things, but that's almost kind of approaching godmoding and a bit sh*t, really.

Plus giving more of a driving force behind trading resources.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's part of the reason why I think this is a map we need. It actually would provide a better ability to manage regional trade and ensure that not every single state is capable of mining rare earths for example. It will give nations the ability to pinpoint their economic strengths and note their weaknesses and convert that into proper commerce. The map would be influenced not just by the topographic map, but also based upon climate and with some inference where certain reasons are more likely to be than others. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Rihan said:

That's part of the reason why I think this is a map we need. It actually would provide a better ability to manage regional trade and ensure that not every single state is capable of mining rare earths for example. It will give nations the ability to pinpoint their economic strengths and note their weaknesses and convert that into proper commerce. The map would be influenced not just by the topographic map, but also based upon climate and with some inference where certain reasons are more likely to be than others. 

It'd certainly be interesting to see whether it'd be more logical to have cities or at least how a canal system might go between them. And railways as well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tagmatium Rules said:

It'd certainly be interesting to see whether it'd be more logical to have cities or at least how a canal system might go between them. And railways as well.

Indeed. This map, while simple, would additionally help us see if our places of cities make any sense at all. Clearly the ones on the coasts do, but the interior ones is a different story.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rihan said:

Indeed. This map, while simple, would additionally help us see if our places of cities make any sense at all. Clearly the ones on the coasts do, but the interior ones is a different story.

Yep.

I placed some of my cities through sheer dint of trying to make some of the places a bit less or more busy than others. Let's see how that comes to bite me :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tagmatium Rules said:

Yep.

I placed some of my cities through sheer dint of trying to make some of the places a bit less or more busy than others. Let's see how that comes to bite me :P

"...the city of Y was built 1000 years ago on a rumored river...800 years later, the purpose of the city is rather unclear and appears to be built for the sheer purpose of saying we can put something here as there is no such river..."

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I think that this idea is worth pursuing, I don't think that it's fair to established nations to rearrange the resources they've established in their factbooks and through RP; so long as the established stated resources are preserved, within reason, this seems more or less fine to me.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fulgistan said:

While I think that this idea is worth pursuing, I don't think that it's fair to established nations to rearrange the resources they've established in their factbooks and through RP; so long as the established stated resources are preserved, within reason, this seems more or less fine to me.

I acknowledge that implementing this after people have already have established certain specifics. If anything, the categories should be as open to interpretation as possible. You say you have 'ore' - it can whatever ore you want it to be. It would be too much of inconvenience to be too specific. Just like oil is more likely to be in some areas over others.

Ultimately, it needs to be simple, practical, and not leave anyone as an autarky. I think that can be achieved, all while taking into account already implied resources.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We could always build it around existing things. So as long as you've got your major natural resources identified in the google sheet, they'd be accounted for in the map?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Faramount said:

We could always build it around existing things. So as long as you've got your major natural resources identified in the google sheet, they'd be accounted for in the map?

That could be a possibility and would get people thinking of their economies more since I have noticed that some as in many (even I am not 100% certain what I have) haven't even filled in those columns. Could be up for conversation.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In most cases I'd say this idea of a ressource map has its origins in RPs where there's an immense disconnect between what nations claim to have and what's realistic for a nation of limited size to have.

As in: those nations in many other RPs that are completely self-sufficient regarding everything and anything (although this is usually very narrowed down to fossil fuels).

At least that's why Rihan and I originally started to think about it... but that scenario doesn't even apply here as far as I can tell.

 

However even here it could be nice to implement for two reasons:

  1. as was already mentioned, in order to come to terms with what ones own nation actually has. Whether your nation has unlimited fresh-water or actually needs to ration that at times/artificially create some/import it, whether or not you export fossil fuel, are partly self-sufficient, or only import gas, etc.pp. ... I'm sure a lot of people here already did that, but I suppose it's always nice to have it written down in one central place.
  2. in order to delve into some commodity trade of primary ressources. Not for the sake of making things complicated and having a complicated market system, but just to create dependencies that'll make diplomacy more complex and interesting. Just have the basics most modern industries relies on: fossil fuels, iron-ore, bauxite, timber, rare-earths, fresh-water, arable land (maybe expressed in '% self-sufficiency'), and whatever else I forgot. Maybe the deeper we delve, adding stuff like specific elements/oxides/ores vital for various industry branches or products.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea of a resource map, but I'd also suggest that it is 'opt in' only, or allow them to make their own resource maps (with rules for said customization so it's not godmodding, limited number of X and Y, etc).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vocenae, the map if anything it would be used as a guide not a definitive statement, meant to give the nation-player the ability to get a general sense of the land, not dictate the exact resources. So if you have a mountain - you probably have ore. I am not going to tell you what it is - I leave that to you (let's just hope everyone doesn't have platinum...). Some places on the map make more sense for agriculture based on climate. Everything is still wide open. Merely wanted to start the conversation. Not to mention that implementing such a concept isn't going to happen overnight and may be not for some months at least.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/1/2018 at 1:33 AM, Vocenae said:

I like the idea of a resource map, but I'd also suggest that it is 'opt in' only, or allow them to make their own resource maps (with rules for said customization so it's not godmodding, limited number of X and Y, etc).

Perhaps this is a question best addressed by people who are actively RPing with this region.

:)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I see nothing wrong with providing additional thoughts on the subject, on how it could be incorporated without removing an aspect of creative agency from players that would be responsible in creating their nation as they envision it. At the end of the day, yes, it's up to everyone here to make that decision as it directly affects them, not me. I simply wanted to suggest, not demand, additional options in the hopes of making this project that much more successful for those that will be involved in it. As a veteran of this community, I simply care about it and want to see it continue to grow in a positive way, regardless if they take any suggestions I might have or not.

As stated, I think the idea of a resource map is a good idea overall.

Edited by Vocenae

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do think a resource map is a good addition. And I do see where some individuals are coming from in regards to it being introduced after the fact. I have been in half a dozen regions that always talked about doing this but never got around to it. I think Europa can pull it off and still be generous to those who already have something developed without creating one-side economies. I say we continue the conversation over time and see where it takes us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Orioni
      We have a highly active community. Multiple posts going up every day. So much that it is sometimes difficult to read everything that's being written. Most of these posts are about politics and leadership. Very high-level. Which reminded me of some topics we might be missing.
      Mother Nature is an awesome force. But she is hardly ever mentioned here. Earthquakes and hurricanes and snowstorms and floodings and forest fires. In RL these all happen on a regular basis.
      A true disaster story is rooted in the primal life and death struggle of man versus classical elements: earth, water, air and fire. Just taking a quick roll call: earth (earthquake), water (the perfect storm, the impossible), air (twister, tornado), fire (the towering inferno). All indisputable disaster stories. In each, the hero fights for their lives against elemental flare-ups.
      But I only recall 1 such recent event when a typhoon struck @Andalla and @Orioni.This prompted a discussion with Andalla to figure out the opportunities of more regular randomness. (How can randomness be regular?)
      Question: is there any interest within the community for a monthly or bi-monthly writing prompts? Followup question: what would be a simple, easy and fair way to do this?
    • By Derthalen
      Hello, I was thinking about how there would likely be some sort of sports between countries, so I wanted to get an idea of what people wanted. This poll is just to determine what sport people are most in favour of, so that we might later start a league.
       
      http://www.strawpoll.me/14162614/r
       
      Edit: Wow, we are going to have fun.
    • By Iverica
      As spoken about on the Discord, this is a request for an "Embassy" subforum. It can be placed underneath the Factbook and Nation Information page.
      Goals: Create a page where players can create embassies with others.
      Benefits:
      1) Interactions are viewable on a single thread. No more hunting all over forums to review your interactions with a single player.
      2) Establishing Embassies can be obvious and readily viewable. Currently, it is not easy to identify who has embassies with whom.
      3) Embassy pages can provide a medium to make official requests to a single player, rather than going "public" (In RP context) to a news agency. This is a preferable alternative to PMs, (given the subject is not sensitive) because it allows others to easily review the context behind an RP as opposed to gleaning an understanding from screenshots of a PM.
      e.g Threads such as:
      "Andalla-Iverica Embassy" will henceforth hold most if not all Andallan and Iverican bilateral meetings. It will be easy for all to review their diplomatic history.
      If anyone has any suggestions, criticism, or comments please feel free.
      Thanks
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Posts

    • @Mauridiviah's Mundus Liber ranks Prymont 8th globally on Inalienable Rights - ATARA Delegate speaks out controversially on survey's flaws NEW HALSHAM, COURTMARSH - Yesterday, the Mundus Liber Institute published the results for their Inalienable Rights Survey, the third global ranking they've releases this year, which ranks nations across the globe based on rights such as working hours, bearing arms, seeking asylum, and drug use restrictions. The United States was ranked eighth overall, for:  no right to bear arms foreigners not allowed to seek asylum adultery is illegal no capital punishment hard drugs are illegal Previously, Prymont has ranked third on the Freedom Index, and second on the LGBT Rights survey, with this placement of eighth coming as a shock to many. Since 2017, the government has worked tirelessly to promote freedom and rights in the country, reversing the negative effects of the socialist tendencies that held back the country from 1995 to 2017. These positive changes were apparent in the first two rankings, but many have called for Prymont to change their stance regarding inalienable rights with the release of the current survey's results. Culture Minister Brooke Weitz agreed to walk PNN through the laws that limited Prymont's final ranking, and to provide an explanation as to why they are in place. PNN learned that bearing arms is illegal to prevent frequent public shootings that are seen in countries where the right to bear arms are present, and to generally ensure the safety of the general populace; foreigners are prevented from seeking asylum due to former legislation implemented by the socialist Freedom Party, and the current National Party are seeking to overturn it; adultery is illegal to promote healthy relationships for the younger generations; capital punishment is illegal as it is seen as excessively harsh, but minor advocate groups are pushing to legalise it; and hard drugs are illegal to ensure the health and safety of the general populace, and to prevent severe health effects that come with the abuse of hard drugs. It's easy to see why these laws are in place once the explanations have been provided, yet thousands took to Wittier this morning to express their dismay and anger at their government. Foreigners being disallowed to seek asylum came heavily under attack, with many calling for capital punishment to be reinstated for society's worst offenders. There was also some support to legalise adultery, with the more vocal citizens claiming that the government shouldn't interfere in their love lives. Despite this, there was mass support for the right to bear arms and hard drug use to both remain strictly illegal. PNN Radio 1 tackled the issue this morning, with radio host Troy Aunan providing brief clarifications upon Prymont's laws and broadcasting the varied opinions of his listeners. During the breakfast show, which usually features political discussion and special guests, the controversial ATARA delegate, Julian Nordeng, made an appearance. A self-proclaimed deeply patriotic man, Nordeng was quick to criticise the Mundus Liber rankings in his uniquely interesting ways. "I mean, where do we begin?" "How about the most criticised set of legislation, the one surrounding a ban on foreigners seeking asylum in the United States?" "What about it? It's a brilliant idea, one that we need to keep! Have you seen the kind of people that are in Argis? You know, the people that we're keeping out? Ahrana is full of commie pigs. Poland-Lithuanian soldiers are killing their neighbours to spread their commie agenda. Greater Serbian politicians are killing their own people to spread their commie agenda. Argis is riddled with the worst kind of people. Do you really want these people coming into our perfectly safe country, and posing a risk to national security as the Serbian dictator tracks them down and sends suicide bombers?" "Don't you think you're slightly exaggerating there, Julian?" "Am I? Think about it, man! Everyone listening, have a good, hard think about it! Use your brains! Clearly, those Mauridivians are twisting our amazing laws to fit their own communist agenda-" "I don't think Mauridiviah is a socialist country."
      Julian Nordeng expressing his disgust at the Mundus Liber results during his interview on PR1. "Shut up, let me finish! We've been placed in the top three in both of their last surveys, right? We're an amazing country, with amazing people who follow our amazing laws. Who gives them the right to place us so low? Let's look at the results, shall we? Number one, Variota. Bollocks. That plastic surgery abortion known as Dina Diva probably sucked off every commie working for the Mundus Liber to get number one. Adaptus, number two. Bollocks again. They sucked off the commies too, but they weren't as good so they only got second. And then Mauridiviah third! The cheek of it! But that's not all, oh no no no! Ahrana... now, are you ready for this... fourth! They're communist filth! They should be dead last! And then Lysia fifth, how did that happen? The commies were probably too drunk on that water-like Lysian wine to think properly. Sayf is sixth, they're clearly up to no good, probably threatened to suicide bomb the Mundus Liber HQ if they didn't rank well, and Gallambria is seventh. Nobody even knows what they do! We should be number one, plain and simple." A spokesperson for the National Party was quick to release a covering statement, claiming that Nordeng's views were strictly his own and were not shared by the party in any way. The statement praised the unbiased work of the Mundus Liber to spread information about the countries of the world, and assured that they'd work with Nordeng to confirm his opinions and to continue his work to further improve the country. Callers to the show were quick to shun Nordeng, who eagerly fought back before the interview finished.  Nevertheless, Nordeng's comments have only further fuelled the raging fire that surrounds the Mundus Liber in the United States. While many back the decision of the institute, some continue to lambaste them, and call for their local government representatives to debate the rankings in Parliament. The National Party have confirmed that they'll continue to make the country a better place to live and visit for all, and will take on board the criticisms provided by the controversial survey.  
    • Don't mind me. I'm not casting any aspersions or anything. I don't have sole rights to it.
    • I have had a chance to look at the wiki and I am happy to say that I look forward to working with you @Rihan to put my page together once I've gotten my factbook in order.
    • "...all of Kipan is in sadness today. Much of the country has been shut down to mourn the passing of Emperor Ozu, the most enlightened and progressive of rulers in several generations. He, like his predecessor, was a benevolent ruler who truly loved his people and strived to make their lives as comfortable as possible. It was at the start of his reign that he proclaimed that all students had the opportunity to attend higher education, outright eliminating school fees. This triggered a 55% increase in the number of students in just five years. During his later years, he even took a bold step by introducing universal healthcare, covering nearly 95% of the populace. These two reforms alone have transformed Kipan. From the outside world, these actions would seem as if the Emperor was gravitating towards socialism. Ozu always firmly reject such titles, saying that it was in the best interest of the Kipanese people." "This same rationale can be applied to Ozu's deathbed declaration of abolishing his own office. NBK found a clip from an interview it had done with Emperor Ozu six years ago in which he commented on some remarks made by the Kipanese Democratic Movement. He said the following: With his death, Democracy seems all but assured at coming. At the time in which the Emperor implied in his past remarks." "The Emperor's body has been laid in state in the Imperial Palace. Members of the Kipanese population will be able to view his body for the next three days before he is buried in a private funeral that will be attended by the Chamberlain, his surviving immediate and extended family members. A spokesman for the Chamberlain would not comment if anyone of the Hundred, the group NBK is for the time being referring to as those to be convened in Ryuku, would be present." "Individuals should be alerted that demand for rail transport to Miyako from across the Metropolis and across the Islands is extremely heavy. Kipan Railways is attempting to accommodate the surge as much as possible by adding additional services."
    • With the ban of FdL, I've been rewriting my nation to be a former Limonaian colony, instead of a former Lysian colony. This has necessarily required the renaming of my nation's cities. I'm hoping in the next map update, they could be changed. Port Jacqueline would now be New Limone
      New Lyrie would now be New Sermerio
      Orville would now be Oroa.
      Zaleville would now be Umberto. Thank you!
×