Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Rekamgil

Suverina's Military Support For Us

Recommended Posts

The Commonwealth of Independent States is committed to worldwide peace, cooperation, and friendship. It is a fundamental principle of the Commonwealth of Independent States that no member nation thereof shall ever engage in aggressive war. Instead, all member nations, individually and collectively, shall adhere to the following principles and practices:

 

I. On War:

 

Article 1: All member nations shall work tirelessly and earnestly for the prevention of war and the maintenance of peace.

 

Article 2: All member nations shall maintain a policy of strict neutrality, if at all possible.

 

Article 3: No member nation shall attack any other nation in Europa, unless certain circumstances obtain. These circumstances are;

 

Sub-section 3-a: If any member nation is attacked they may defend themselves and engage the enemy in belligerent military activity

 

Sub-section 3-b: In the event that any member nation is attacked, all other member nations are, by default and automatically, at war with the aggressor nation.

 

Sub-section 3-c: However, exceptionally, if the member nation has been attacked because it has unnecessarily provoked attack either by word or by deed, the Commonwealth of Independent States governing council reserves the right to block belligerency by all other members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Any member nation acting in contravention of the governing council's express ruling shall be subject to expulsion from the Commonwealth of Independent States. The governing council will also reserve the right of determination as to whether any member nation invited attack by unnecessary word or deed.

 

Sub-section 3-d: It must be noted and accepted by all member nations that their actions, automatically through membership in the Commonwealth of Independent States, will affect all other member nations. For this reason, the above sub-section (3-c) is necessary. Any member nation that acts belligerently, or that invites attack upon itself or other member nations, will be drawing all member nations into belligerency. This must be avoided at all costs because, after all, our main goal is the preservation of peace and neutrality.

 

***ENCODED***

 

TO: The Government of Suverina

FROM: CIS Governing Council

 

We have appended a lengthy section from the CIS Charter, to which Suverina is a signatory. We have received word that Suverina intends to militarily support Upper Strathyclyde. The governing council has ruled that Suverina must stop military support for Upper Strathyclyde immediately. Suverina's continued support for US has the potential to draw the CIS into a war in which we have no interest at present:

 

Article I states that all CIS members must work towards the maintenance of peace. Military support of US in the Ravenhelm conflict runs counter to said article.

 

Article II states that we shall remain neutral if possible. Potentially entangling Suverina in a US led war runs counter to our neutrality policy.

 

Article III states that CIS member states shall not attack any other nation in Europa unless certain circumstances obtain. The governing council has ruled that those certain circumstances have not been met. Suverina has not been attacked in this instance, and any war-like suport for US may drag the entire CIS into their war as per Sub-section 3-b. We draw particular attention to the following passage from the charter: "Any member nation acting in contravention of the governing council's express ruling shall be subject to expulsion from the Commonwealth of Independent States. The governing council will also reserve the right of determination as to whether any member nation invited attack by unnecessary word or deed." Military support for US in this instance might invite military attack.

 

We wish to continue working with Suverina and impress upon them the dire nature of their support for US. In recent times the US has withdrawn from the CIS, been granted readmission and then again withdrawn. This last withdrawal was accompanied by the severing of diplomatic ties, and threats against the personal freedom of our diplomats in US territory. Diplomatic ties have not been restored to date. We would like to take the US at its word when it says it is seeking better relations, but the manic nature of relations with them (at one time terrible, then good, then bad again) makes us wary of supporting them. The governing council will require a significant period of normalized relations with US before we can even think about militarily supporting them again.

 

Please cease military support for Upper Strathyclyde immediately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To: CIS

From: US

 

We recognise that however hypocritical and Biased the CIS is, we would not want Suverina to lose its position on the council. As such we deny any military support given in the future, from that nation.

 

You may now cease the red tape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
To: CIS

From: US

 

We recognise that however hypocritical and Biased the CIS is, we would not want Suverina to lose its position on the council. As such we deny any military support given in the future, from that nation.

 

You may now cease the red tape.

***Encoded***

 

To: Suverina

From: CIS Council

 

It is exactly this type of infammatory rhetoric which troubles the council. We hope you understand.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

To: Upper Strathyclyde

From: CIS Council

 

We are unsure how you got your hands on our encoded message to Suverina [OOC: wink.gif] , but we are glad that you have seen fit to take a troubling decision out of Suverina's hands. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OOC: Let's say i shared it. I probably would... smile.gif

________________________________________________________________________

TO: Rekamgil, other CIS members

From: Suverina

 

We are withdrawing any offers of military support to the US. It is clear that our whole government didn't agree on doing it. It was mostly leade by various military leaders that the government can not be taken part of. We excuse ourself for this incident and the responsible government officals shall be imprisoned.

 

**Encoded***

 

To: US

From: Suverina

 

As you know we must withdraw our offer, although our support shall always be with you.

We shall support you with material and supplies if we can.

 

OOC: The whole thing did only brake article 1 though.. rolleyes.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to close this thread as well, as it's a bit pointless now US has left the region.

 

If anyone disagrees, please do PM me and we'll sort something out. smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Posts

    • @Mauridiviah's Mundus Liber ranks Prymont 8th globally on Inalienable Rights - ATARA Delegate speaks out controversially on survey's flaws NEW HALSHAM, COURTMARSH - Yesterday, the Mundus Liber Institute published the results for their Inalienable Rights Survey, the third global ranking they've releases this year, which ranks nations across the globe based on rights such as working hours, bearing arms, seeking asylum, and drug use restrictions. The United States was ranked eighth overall, for:  no right to bear arms foreigners not allowed to seek asylum adultery is illegal no capital punishment hard drugs are illegal Previously, Prymont has ranked third on the Freedom Index, and second on the LGBT Rights survey, with this placement of eighth coming as a shock to many. Since 2017, the government has worked tirelessly to promote freedom and rights in the country, reversing the negative effects of the socialist tendencies that held back the country from 1995 to 2017. These positive changes were apparent in the first two rankings, but many have called for Prymont to change their stance regarding inalienable rights with the release of the current survey's results. Culture Minister Brooke Weitz agreed to walk PNN through the laws that limited Prymont's final ranking, and to provide an explanation as to why they are in place. PNN learned that bearing arms is illegal to prevent frequent public shootings that are seen in countries where the right to bear arms are present, and to generally ensure the safety of the general populace; foreigners are prevented from seeking asylum due to former legislation implemented by the socialist Freedom Party, and the current National Party are seeking to overturn it; adultery is illegal to promote healthy relationships for the younger generations; capital punishment is illegal as it is seen as excessively harsh, but minor advocate groups are pushing to legalise it; and hard drugs are illegal to ensure the health and safety of the general populace, and to prevent severe health effects that come with the abuse of hard drugs. It's easy to see why these laws are in place once the explanations have been provided, yet thousands took to Wittier this morning to express their dismay and anger at their government. Foreigners being disallowed to seek asylum came heavily under attack, with many calling for capital punishment to be reinstated for society's worst offenders. There was also some support to legalise adultery, with the more vocal citizens claiming that the government shouldn't interfere in their love lives. Despite this, there was mass support for the right to bear arms and hard drug use to both remain strictly illegal. PNN Radio 1 tackled the issue this morning, with radio host Troy Aunan providing brief clarifications upon Prymont's laws and broadcasting the varied opinions of his listeners. During the breakfast show, which usually features political discussion and special guests, the controversial ATARA delegate, Julian Nordeng, made an appearance. A self-proclaimed deeply patriotic man, Nordeng was quick to criticise the Mundus Liber rankings in his uniquely interesting ways. "I mean, where do we begin?" "How about the most criticised set of legislation, the one surrounding a ban on foreigners seeking asylum in the United States?" "What about it? It's a brilliant idea, one that we need to keep! Have you seen the kind of people that are in Argis? You know, the people that we're keeping out? Ahrana is full of commie pigs. Poland-Lithuanian soldiers are killing their neighbours to spread their commie agenda. Greater Serbian politicians are killing their own people to spread their commie agenda. Argis is riddled with the worst kind of people. Do you really want these people coming into our perfectly safe country, and posing a risk to national security as the Serbian dictator tracks them down and sends suicide bombers?" "Don't you think you're slightly exaggerating there, Julian?" "Am I? Think about it, man! Everyone listening, have a good, hard think about it! Use your brains! Clearly, those Mauridivians are twisting our amazing laws to fit their own communist agenda-" "I don't think Mauridiviah is a socialist country."
      Julian Nordeng expressing his disgust at the Mundus Liber results during his interview on PR1. "Shut up, let me finish! We've been placed in the top three in both of their last surveys, right? We're an amazing country, with amazing people who follow our amazing laws. Who gives them the right to place us so low? Let's look at the results, shall we? Number one, Variota. Bollocks. That plastic surgery abortion known as Dina Diva probably sucked off every commie working for the Mundus Liber to get number one. Adaptus, number two. Bollocks again. They sucked off the commies too, but they weren't as good so they only got second. And then Mauridiviah third! The cheek of it! But that's not all, oh no no no! Ahrana... now, are you ready for this... fourth! They're communist filth! They should be dead last! And then Lysia fifth, how did that happen? The commies were probably too drunk on that water-like Lysian wine to think properly. Sayf is sixth, they're clearly up to no good, probably threatened to suicide bomb the Mundus Liber HQ if they didn't rank well, and Gallambria is seventh. Nobody even knows what they do! We should be number one, plain and simple." A spokesperson for the National Party was quick to release a covering statement, claiming that Nordeng's views were strictly his own and were not shared by the party in any way. The statement praised the unbiased work of the Mundus Liber to spread information about the countries of the world, and assured that they'd work with Nordeng to confirm his opinions and to continue his work to further improve the country. Callers to the show were quick to shun Nordeng, who eagerly fought back before the interview finished.  Nevertheless, Nordeng's comments have only further fuelled the raging fire that surrounds the Mundus Liber in the United States. While many back the decision of the institute, some continue to lambaste them, and call for their local government representatives to debate the rankings in Parliament. The National Party have confirmed that they'll continue to make the country a better place to live and visit for all, and will take on board the criticisms provided by the controversial survey.  
    • Don't mind me. I'm not casting any aspersions or anything. I don't have sole rights to it.
    • I have had a chance to look at the wiki and I am happy to say that I look forward to working with you @Rihan to put my page together once I've gotten my factbook in order.
    • "...all of Kipan is in sadness today. Much of the country has been shut down to mourn the passing of Emperor Ozu, the most enlightened and progressive of rulers in several generations. He, like his predecessor, was a benevolent ruler who truly loved his people and strived to make their lives as comfortable as possible. It was at the start of his reign that he proclaimed that all students had the opportunity to attend higher education, outright eliminating school fees. This triggered a 55% increase in the number of students in just five years. During his later years, he even took a bold step by introducing universal healthcare, covering nearly 95% of the populace. These two reforms alone have transformed Kipan. From the outside world, these actions would seem as if the Emperor was gravitating towards socialism. Ozu always firmly reject such titles, saying that it was in the best interest of the Kipanese people." "This same rationale can be applied to Ozu's deathbed declaration of abolishing his own office. NBK found a clip from an interview it had done with Emperor Ozu six years ago in which he commented on some remarks made by the Kipanese Democratic Movement. He said the following: With his death, Democracy seems all but assured at coming. At the time in which the Emperor implied in his past remarks." "The Emperor's body has been laid in state in the Imperial Palace. Members of the Kipanese population will be able to view his body for the next three days before he is buried in a private funeral that will be attended by the Chamberlain, his surviving immediate and extended family members. A spokesman for the Chamberlain would not comment if anyone of the Hundred, the group NBK is for the time being referring to as those to be convened in Ryuku, would be present." "Individuals should be alerted that demand for rail transport to Miyako from across the Metropolis and across the Islands is extremely heavy. Kipan Railways is attempting to accommodate the surge as much as possible by adding additional services."
    • With the ban of FdL, I've been rewriting my nation to be a former Limonaian colony, instead of a former Lysian colony. This has necessarily required the renaming of my nation's cities. I'm hoping in the next map update, they could be changed. Port Jacqueline would now be New Limone
      New Lyrie would now be New Sermerio
      Orville would now be Oroa.
      Zaleville would now be Umberto. Thank you!
×